There is this in my favorite words. "There are two kinds of people in the world, the one who swings and the one who doesn't." This is the line that Naoto Takenaka said in "Sing Girls". I think it's a very tasty and deep word. My master smokes, but there seems to be a reason for that. According to him, "There are two kinds of people in the world, ones who don’t smoke and are not kind, and ones who do smoke and are kind." It does not mean that all the people who don't smoke are not kind, but those who are not kind are among those who don't smoke. On the other hand, people who smoke are generally kind. It seems that he smokes because he doesn't want to be classified as a group of unkind people. People who smoke are hiding in the narrow places so that secondary smoke doesn't go to those who don't smoke. And while they are paying high taxes of Tabaco. To those who never smoke, they never say "Why don't you smoke!" And even if they get lung cancer, they won't blame others. People who don't smoke don't treat smokers as human beings, and even though it's a matter of personal responsibility, they're forced them to stop it “for your health” and they are completely intolerant. In one real case, some people who don’t smoke wanted to make serious damage on the smoker in the same mansion by suing him with the reason that they were damaged by secondary smoke making up with a fake medical certificate. Finally, the court found out that it was a lie. I don't think it's too much to say that it's malicious intolerance.
It is said that there is a relationship between tobacco and lung cancer, but even though smoking cessation has been promoted so much and secondary smoke has been prevented, the number of lung cancer patients is increasing in Japan.
This explains that it just looks like that because there is a time lag in the smoking rate and the occurrence of lung cancer patients (USA: shown below), but at least in Japan, it has increased monotoned recently, and there is no sign of going down. Isn't it strange to say how there is a time lag?
There are also the following data on the relationship of smoking and cancer.
Here, among lung cancer patients, including those who have smoked in the past and now quit smoking, 92.5% of men and 24.9% of women develop lung cancer. Non-smoker emphasize 92.5%. However it should be emphasized that 75.1% of female lung cancer patients, who should have an overwhelmingly small number of samples, develop lung cancer despite not smoking in the past or the present as a clear significant trend. And women should be warned that there are things to be careful about other than smoking. Possible causes can include hormones specific to women and environmental pollution, especially PM2.5.
In addition, among those who are currently smoking, 55% of people have developed the disease, and 47.1% are not. It's obviously a scam that makes this difference of about 8% statistically dominant.
This is because that, considering the smoking rate of 27.1% (2019), the number of people who do not develop the disease is overwhelmingly large; 6,330,000 men (in about 49,600,000 adult men (2,008 years in Japan)). In Japan, there were about 8,000 male lung cancer patients in 2015, of which 55% of them smoked and developed lung cancer, so there are 4,400 who were smoking and developed lung cancer. In other words, the number of people who smoked and developed lung cancer is about 0.07% of all smokers (a ratio of 7 out of 10,000 people). However, looking at this number, do you want to quit smoking because lung cancer develops due to tobacco? If you think so with this number, didn't you stop smoking a long time ago? Rather, isn't it better to improve your lifestyle by changing to a diet with a lot of dietary fiber, exercising regularly, or something else?
There is also the data from the National Cancer Center. The risk of lung cancer death in the group subjected to passive smoking ("almost every day") is 1.06 times higher than the group that did not receive. Nowadays, what kind of person is exposed to passive smoking almost every day? It's not twice or tripled, but 1.06 times...?
I especially to stop women's hysterical attacking against smokers. They may say ”We don't want to take any harmful substances into our bodies”. If that's the case, I think you should stop eating too much junk food, Chinese ingredients and sweets.
One honest doctor says:
Tetsuya Okunaka: Deputy Director of Sanno Hospital
"Of the 100 patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma that I recently operated on, more than the 60 were non-smokers. Lung gland cancer is a typical cancer that accounts for more than half of lung cancer, so as far as I can see from this data, I don't think it's necessarily "You will have lung cancer because you smoke.”
Of course, lung cancer other than pulmonary gland cancer has been revealed to have a causal relationship with cigarettes, but that is statistics when you live until about 80 years old. For example, in people in their 30s and 40s, there is only a 0.5% chance that a man in his thirties will get all cancers, including lung cancer, by their 40s.
As far as people are older than middle age, the fact that "it causes lung cancer if you smoke" has nothing to do with smoking."
END of This Blog
Comments